See what a validation package looks like when it builds itself
A short walkthrough of how GxPForge keeps traceability current as your team works, instead of reconstructing it before a release.
Book a demoCollege of American Pathologists accreditation reviews laboratory systems against detailed checklists, including information systems used for reporting and record keeping. A CAP inspection can surface the same kind of gaps a GxP audit would, missing sign offs, unclear change history, but through its own checklist structure.
CAP's checklists get specific about information system controls, things like access restrictions, result verification, and system downtime procedures. A lab that has never mapped its LIS or LIMS validation package against those specific checklist items can find gaps during a CAP inspection that a general CSV review would have missed.
For labs that also support GxP regulated work, the CAP checklist and general CSV expectations reinforce each other more than they conflict, both want evidence that a system behaves reliably and that changes are controlled. The practical work is making sure a single validation package can answer both sets of questions without duplicating effort.
A short walkthrough of how GxPForge keeps traceability current as your team works, instead of reconstructing it before a release.
Book a demo