See what a validation package looks like when it builds itself
A short walkthrough of how GxPForge keeps traceability current as your team works, instead of reconstructing it before a release.
Book a demoAn auditor rarely reads a traceability matrix top to bottom. They pick a handful of requirements at random and follow each one all the way through, to the test that proved it, the evidence that test produced, and the approval that signed off on it. One broken link is usually enough to trigger a deeper look.
Auditors know a well maintained matrix looks the same as a poorly maintained one at a glance, rows and columns, all filled in. The real test is whether those rows hold up when followed individually. Picking three or four requirements and tracing each one end to end is a fast way to tell a genuine matrix from one assembled the week before the audit.
A requirement with no linked test case. A test case marked passed with no evidence attached. A requirement that changed after the matrix was built, with the matrix never updated to match. Each of these is a small gap on its own, but a pattern of them across a matrix tells an auditor the underlying process is not being followed consistently.
A matrix that is computed from the actual systems of record, a merged pull request, a passed test run, an approved requirement, holds up better than one maintained by hand, simply because there is no gap between what happened and what got recorded.
A short walkthrough of how GxPForge keeps traceability current as your team works, instead of reconstructing it before a release.
Book a demo